Role of Keystone Predators in Trophic Cascade Regulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19455319Keywords:
keystone predator; trophic cascade; biomanipulation, pike; perch; zooplankton; phytoplankton;, ; chlorophyll-a; lake ecology;, structural equation modelling;, cyanobacteria; Water Framework DirectiveAbstract
Keystone predators exert disproportionate regulatory effects on community structure and ecosystem function relative to their biomass, primarily through trophic cascades that propagate top-down control from apex predators through mesopredator and prey communities to primary producers. This study quantified trophic cascade strength, community stability metrics, and ecosystem productivity responses across a predator manipulation gradient in three temperate lacustrine systems (Italy, Germany, Switzerland) encompassing 18 lake basins spanning a natural gradient of piscivore (pike Esox lucius and perch Perca fluviatilis) biomass density (0.8–18.4 kg/ha). Standardised hydroacoustic surveys, gillnet sampling, benthic macroinvertebrate assessments, phytoplankton biomass measurements (chlorophyll-a), and zooplankton size-structure analyses were conducted seasonally over two years (2020–2021). Piscivore biomass density was the strongest predictor of the planktivore-to-total fish biomass ratio (r s = -0.82, p < 0.001), mean zooplankton body size (r s = +0.76, p < 0.001), and chlorophyll-a concentration (r s = -0.74, p < 0.001), confirming a four-level trophic cascade (piscivore fi planktivore fish fi zooplankton fi phytoplankton). Structural equation modelling confirmed direct and indirect cascade pathways with a total cascade amplification factor of 3.8 ± 0.6 (phytoplankton biomass response per unit change in piscivore biomass). Lakes with piscivore biomass ‡ 8 kg/ha showed significantly lower cyanobacterial bloom frequency (mean 1.2 ± 0.8 events/yr vs. 4.6 ± 1.4 in low-piscivore lakes; Mann-Whitney U = 4, p < 0.001), demonstrating a direct ecosystem service benefit of keystone predator maintenance for water quality. These findings provide empirical support for biomanipulation as a cost-effective water quality management tool and quantify keystone predator density thresholds applicable to lake restoration planning under the EU Water Framework Directive.Downloads
Published
2026-08-10
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Role of Keystone Predators in Trophic Cascade Regulation. (2026). International Journal of Animal Biodiversity, Conservation and Systematics ( IJABC), 1(3), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19455319

