Machine Learning Models in Wildlife Population Estimation

Authors

  • Elena Rossi Assistant Professor, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Western Europe Data Science University, Madrid, Spain Author
  • Daniel Lindberg Research Scientist, Institute of Intelligent Systems, Swiss Institute of Machine Intelligence, Zurich, Switzerland Author
  • Anna Jensen Associate Professor, Department of Machine Learning, Western Europe Data Science University, Madrid, Spain Author

Keywords:

machine learning, wildlife population estimation, camera trap, convolutional neural network, random forest, distance sampling, occupancy modelling, conservation technology

Abstract

Accurate wildlife population estimation is fundamental to evidence-based conservation management, yet traditional methods such as mark-recapture, distance sampling, and aerial transect surveys are logistically demanding, expensive, and often limited in spatial and temporal coverage. Machine learning (ML) approaches -- including random forests, gradient boosting machines, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and recurrent neural networks (RNNs) -- offer scalable alternatives by integrating heterogeneous data streams such as camera-trap images, acoustic recordings, satellite remote sensing, and citizen-science occurrence records into unified predictive frameworks. This study benchmarked seven ML architectures against conventional distance-sampling baselines across six target species representing diverse taxa, survey contexts, and data availability scenarios: African elephant (Loxodonta africana), snow leopard (Panthera uncia), Amur tiger (Panthera tigris altaica), European wolf (Canis lupus), humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), and Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). CNN-based image classification applied to camera-trap arrays achieved the highest overall accuracy for terrestrial megafauna (mean MAE = 4.8% +- 1.2% across species), outperforming conventional distance sampling (MAE = 9.4% +- 2.8%) and random forest models (MAE = 6.7% +- 1.9%). Gradient boosting machines integrating multi-source environmental covariates provided the best performance for cryptic and low-density species where camera-trap encounter rates were insufficient for deep learning. Ensemble approaches combining CNN detections with spatially explicit occupancy models reduced population estimate uncertainty by 38.4% relative to single-method baselines. These findings demonstrate that ML-integrated survey pipelines can substantially improve the precision, cost-efficiency, and geographic scalability of wildlife population monitoring for conservation decision-making.

Author Biographies

  • Elena Rossi, Assistant Professor, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Western Europe Data Science University, Madrid, Spain

    Assistant Professor, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Western Europe Data Science University, Madrid, Spain

  • Daniel Lindberg, Research Scientist, Institute of Intelligent Systems, Swiss Institute of Machine Intelligence, Zurich, Switzerland

    Research Scientist, Institute of Intelligent Systems, Swiss Institute of Machine Intelligence, Zurich, Switzerland

  • Anna Jensen, Associate Professor, Department of Machine Learning, Western Europe Data Science University, Madrid, Spain

    Associate Professor, Department of Machine Learning, Western Europe Data Science University, Madrid, Spain

Downloads

Published

2024-06-15 — Updated on 2026-07-19

How to Cite

Machine Learning Models in Wildlife Population Estimation. (2026). International Journal of Animal Biodiversity, Conservation and Systematics ( IJABC), 4(4), 25-32. https://stanfordgroup.org/index.php/IJABC/article/view/253

Similar Articles

1-10 of 89

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.